FIG to PDF can provide a page-based view of a Figma design for review or documentation. Choose the intended frames and inspect text and component states; a PDF is a static representation, not the collaborative file or its interactive prototype.
Drop your .FIG file here
or click to browse from your device
A Figma file can contain multiple pages, explorations, and alternate component states. Select the frames that belong in the review and order them so the PDF reads as a flow rather than a collection of unrelated screens.
Avoid exporting internal drafts or notes unless reviewers are meant to see them. Use names that correspond to the project flow and keep a reference to the Figma revision under review.
A Figma prototype can include links, overlays, and interaction states. PDF pages show a visual frame but do not reproduce clickable transitions or live component behavior.
If a reviewer must test a flow, provide the approved prototype link through the team's access controls. Use PDF for annotations and a fixed visual record, not as evidence that the prototype works.
Missing fonts can change labels and alignment. Inspect screens with dense controls, dialogs, and responsive variants, and ensure the PDF shows the intended state of interactive components.
A full-page export can shrink interface text. Check at normal reading size and consider separate detail pages when a reviewer must read small labels or compare alternate states.
The collaborative design file retains components, constraints, comments, and layout structure. PDF is easier to distribute but does not replace the source for editing or developer inspection.
Label the export date and frame set. When feedback is incorporated, update the Figma file and generate a fresh proof to avoid comments being attached to an outdated screen. If the review concerns a user flow, include a separate description of the intended transitions; the page sequence alone may not explain conditional states or interactions. Keep the prototype link access-controlled when it contains internal material. Note the intended viewport and platform for each frame so a reviewer does not mistake a mobile layout for a desktop state.
A static PDF should not be expected to reproduce an interactive prototype. Share an approved prototype link when interaction is part of review.
Choose the intended pages or frames in the source workflow and inspect the order and contents of the PDF.
It shows rendered states rather than editable component relationships. Keep the collaborative file for design updates.
Large frames may be scaled down to page dimensions. Use a larger output or separate details so labels remain readable.
No. It is a visual artifact. Functional prototype behavior needs a separate review in the approved design environment.
Free, instant, and 100% private. Your files are processed locally in your browser.